The selection of articles using the "double blind" peer review system

The manuscripts received for publication in the "Perspectives of Law and Public Administration" will be revised using the „double blind” peer review system, respecting international standards of scientific journals. Thus, any article submitted for publication will be reviewed by at least two reviewers with a national and international reputation in legal sciences. The review will be done on an anonymous basis (author's name is not communicated to the reviewers; reviewers name is not communicated to the author). If is necessary, the authors will receive recommendations and observations to improve the quality of their paper's content. It is possible to refuse publication of the article to the proposal made by reviewers. 
Rights and responsibilities of reviewers are presented in Ethics and Malpractice Statement for "Perspectives of Law and Public Administration".
The articles evaluation is performed by scientific reviewers using the Evaluation form for the articles that are received by Perspectives of Law and Public Administration.

The articles are checked to combat and prevent plagiarism with software:

Articles are checked for the use of artificial intelligence using software:

CĂTĂLIN-SILVIU SĂRARU, Editor in chief 
catalin.sararu@businesslawconference.ro